Search

Monday, August 31, 2009

NHPC CM Rating 47/1 00


NHPC is the largest hydroelectric power gen­erating company in the country. It has 13 op­erating hydro electric power (HEP) plants with an installed capacity of5,175 MW including two power stations of total 1,520-MW ca­pacity set up through its joint venture subsid­iary Narmada Hydroelectric Development Corporation (NHDC). Current total generat­ing capacity is 5,134.2 MW, taking into ac­count the downgrade of the capacity ratings of Loktak and Tanakpur power stations by the Central Electricity Authority. All the ex­isting power projects of the company (ex­cluding the N subsidiary) are located in the northern and north-eastern states such as Jammu & Kashmir, Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Manipur and Sikkim. The two HEP stations are in Madhya Pradesh.
NHPC is constructing II additional hy­droelectric projects, which are expected to increase the installed capacity by 4,622 MW. These plants, barring Teesta Low Dam IV, are mostly in the north and northeastern states and scheduled to be commissioned between December 2009 and March 2013. The Teesta Low Dam IV project is coming up in the DaIjeeling district of West Bengal. NHPC is awaiting government sanction to build another five projects with an antici­pated capacity of 4,565 MW on its own and another 2,166-MW capacity projects through certain N projects. In addition, the company is surveying and investigating pro­posals for nine additional projects totaling 7,255 MW of anticipated capacity.
Apart from development and operation of HEP projects, NHPC also develops, de­signs, and delivers HEP station to clients. The company has executed two HEP projects, i.e. Kurichhu HEP in Bhutan and Devighat HEP in Nepal, on contract. Further, it also pro­vides technical, management advisory and consultancy services to domestic and interna­tional clients. So far it has completed 76 con­sulting assignments and had 17 consulting as­signments on hand end May 2009.
11,82,49,343 equity shares of Rs 10 each (9.1% of post- issue equity). While NHPC will not get any amount from offer for sale (which will go to the government), the pro­ceeds from fresh issue will be used to part fmance the construction and development of Subansiri Lower in Arunachal Pradesh, Uri II in Jammu & Kashmir (J&K), Chamera III in Himachal Pradesh, Parbati III in Himachal Pradesh, Nimoo Bazgo and Chutak in J&K, and Teesta Low Dam IV power projects as well as for general corporate purposes.
Strengths
· Operational efficiency track record ofthe existing power plants is strong.
· Proven execution capability in designing, executing, completing HEPs.
· The Nirnoo Bazgo (45 MW) and Chutak (44 MW) HEPs in J&K were registered by the executive board of Clean Development Mechanism (CDM). These two projects are scheduled to commission in August 20 I 0 and February 2011, respectively, and will generate carbon credit. Also pursuing CDM registration for other projects.
Weaknesses
· HEPs are typically associated with longer execution period as well as high execution risks: geological, hydrological as well as environmental. Rehabilitation and re­settlement issues are obstacles and often result in delays in the completion of projects. Moreover, there is little return on equity investments made during project execution.
electricity board as per the MoUs signed with the respective state governments fol­lowing the power purchase agreements.
· Among others, the tariff includes annual fixed charge (AFC) consisting of primary energy charge and capacity charges. How­ever, under the new tariff policy effective from I April 2009, the capacity index has been replaced with the normative annual plant availability factor (NAPAF). Ca­pacity charge for a power generating sta­tion will constitute 50% of the AFC and will be calculated using a formula that takes into account the NAPAF and the actual plant availability factor achieved. Earlier, if the capacity was available, the capacity charges could be recovered. Now, capac­ity has to actually operate at or above NAPAF. So if there were insufficient wa­ter, which prevents the plant from operat­ing at or above NAPAF, the capacity charge would be adversely affected, even though the unit might have available capacity. Also, earlier capacity charge was equal to AFC less the primary energy charge. Now, 50% of AFC will depend on capacity charge. So this has introduced volatility in AFC, ca­pacity charge and revenue, especially when water availability is poor.
· Supplies 12% of the energy generated free to the respective state or its utilities or the
The current public offer has two compo­nents: Disinvestment from the Union government's existing holding 55,91,24,672 equity shares of Rs 10 each (4.5% of post­issue equity) and fresh issue of

No comments:

Post a Comment